| PlanningThe 
            siting of the warehouse was recommended by the eminent engineer 
            Thomas Telford, who was supervising the completion of the canal, 
            and the detailed design was provided by Bartin Haigh, a Liverpool 
            builder who had probably had experience of building dock warehouses 
            in his home town. Haigh proposed a row of three adjoining units 
            with five floors and with brick vaulted cellars underneath. The 
            Canal Company thought that two units would be sufficient, and to 
            save expense, they suggested building only three floors initially 
            and adding the other two later if necessary. However, Haigh recommended 
            building to the full height, and this was agreed.
 Building ContractWilliam 
            Rees & Son of Gloucester put in a tender for £6600, and 
            a contract was signed on 18th May 1826. Within a month, it was found 
            that the ground was not as suitable as had been expected, and additional 
            work was required to lay large stone blocks to provide good foundations. 
            Possibly as a further consequence of the poor ground, it was decided 
            to lower the height of the building by one floor, and the contract 
            price was reduced by £820.
 MaterialsThe bricks 
            used for the walls probably came from the riverside brickworks at 
            Walham, and the stone sills and lintels came from Bath and the Forest 
            of Dean. The contract allowed free use of the basin for unloading 
            from boats, but some of the bricks had to brought by horse and cart 
            while water was drained out of the basin to allow completion of 
            the canal banks. The timber for the roof frames and the floors was 
            probably imported from the Baltic area, and the roof slates were 
            brought round the coast from North Wales. The cast-iron columns 
            supporting the floors most likely came from William Montague's foundry 
            near Westgate Bridge.
 Building ProgressWilliam 
            Rees and his men made good progress with the building work, and 
            by the end of the year, they installed a stone tablet near the top 
            of the wall bearing the inscription "The Glocester and Berkeley 
            Canal Company's Warehouses Erected by W. Rees and Son Ano. Dom. 
            1826". Work continued through the winter and was effectively 
            completed on schedule in February 1827. The Canal Company initially 
            objected to the hanging of the window shutters, but when Telford 
            was brought in to adjudicate, he ruled that they were sufficiently 
            near the description in the specification to be acceptable. Thus 
            the building was ready for the opening of the canal on 26th April 
            1827, and it no doubt provided a superb vantage point for a few 
            of the vast crowd who gathered to see the first two vessels come 
            to their moorings in the basin amid noisy celebrations.
 Early Tenants for the CellarsThe 
            early tenants were mainly local men who realised the advantage of 
            importing direct to Gloucester, thereby cutting out the former need 
            for trans-shipment at Bristol where there were high port charges. 
            The brick vaulted cellars were of immediate interest to two firms 
            of wine importers, Messrs. Johnsons (later Johnsons and Tasker) 
            and Messrs. Saunders (later Martin and Washbourne). However, it 
            was found that the doors and windows did not meet the standard of 
            security required by the Customs for bonded stores, where imported 
            goods could be kept without paying duty, and so modifications were 
            carried out by the Canal Company. They also improved the rolling 
            ways at the entrances to the cellars. Unfortunately it was soon 
            found that in wet weather, the cellars suffered from flooding, and 
            after repeated complaints from the tenants, the Canal Company raised 
            the floor a few inches. One of the tenants then asked for a reduction 
            in rent as his storage space had been reduced, but the Canal Company 
            refused saying that the improved condition of the cellar compensated 
            for the loss of storage.
 Early Tenants for the Main FloorsThe 
            upper part of the building was designed so that individual floors 
            on each side of the central partition wall could be rented to different 
            merchants. There were two sets of boxed-in stairs with lockable 
            doors on all floors, so that each merchant only had access to his 
            own goods and to the hoisting winches that were installed in the 
            roof space over the loading doors. The early tenants were mainly 
            small corn merchants who started importing wheat, barley and oats 
            from Ireland and occasionally from Europe. These included Mr. Lucy, 
            Mr. Morris, Joseph Hobbs and James Lloyd.
 Paying LabourersAnother 
            early tenant was the firm of Price & Washbourne. They were primarily 
            timber merchants, but they also started importing corn, and they 
            were initially over-generous in paying labourers to do the unloading. 
            An old man later remembered "When they fust begind, they know'd 
            nought about it, and they gid at the rate of 9d per hundred bushels. 
            We did four-and-twenty hundred the very fust dee. This reet didun't 
            last more nor two dees, vor they zoon found out as this yur reet 
            wud niver do, and they drop't it. If thy had ah kipd on as they 
            begind, why two dees a wik wuld ha dun I capeetal".
 Increased RentsBy March 
            1829, all the floors in the building were occupied and there was 
            a waiting list for space as it became available. Tenancies changed 
            quite frequently as each merchant's trade fluctuated, and there 
            was some unofficial sub-letting. To try to regularise matters, the 
            Canal Company gave all tenants formal notice to quit and proposed 
            to introduce higher rents. This was naturally resisted and eventually 
            a compromise was reached. In September 1833, it was agreed that 
            the rents would be £60 per annum for each cellar, £70 
            for each first floor and £65, £55 and  £50 
            for the higher floors. The lower rents compensated for the additional 
            effort required when loading goods in and out of the higher floors.
 Atlas BellThere were 
            few watches around in those days, and so the Canal Company set up 
            a bell on the south east corner of their warehouse to signal the 
            docker's starting and finishing times. The bell came from the full-rigged 
            ship Atlas, launched in 1812, that had made several voyages 
            out to India and China for the East India Company. As well as being 
            rung at regular times by the watchman on duty, it also served occasionally 
            as an alarm bell when there was a fire on board a ship or in a warehouse.
 Tenants in the 1830s and 40sDuring 
            the 1830s and 40s, the corn trade was expanding and was moving into 
            the hands of larger merchants, such as J & C Sturge from Birmingham, 
            Wait James & Co from Bristol and Phillpotts Lloyds & Co. 
            These firms had their own warehouses in the docks, but they still 
            used the Canal Company's building for additional space when required. 
            Another important tenant was Fox Sons & Co. It was during this 
            period that iron bars were installed in many of the lower window 
            openings so that the floors could be used as bonded stores.
 Change to One Occupier in Each HalfFollowing 
            the repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846, there was a large increase 
            in corn imports, particularly from Europe and the Black Sea ports 
            around the mouth of the Danube. New corn merchants became established 
            and more warehouses were built. There was no longer a need to cater 
            for small merchants who only required one or two floors, and the 
            Canal Company was able to let each half of their building as a unit. 
            For many years, the western half was occupied by Thomas Robinson 
            & Co. and the eastern half by John Weston & Co., both firms 
            also having large warehouses elsewhere in the docks.
 Office BuildingIt seems 
            that John Weston had a small office in his part of the warehouse 
            as the Canal Company allowed him to have a stove with a chimney 
            of terra-cotta tubes passing outside the building. Then in 1873, 
            Weston built a single storey office adjoining the east end of the 
            warehouse, and this had the benefit of gas lighting as well as fireplaces. 
            A second floor was added in 1889. This extension obscured the name 
            "North Warehouse" that had been painted on the east wall 
            of the main building, and the sign was only revealed again when 
            the office was demolished in the 1980s.
 Change to a Single OccupierIn 
            the early years of the 20th century, the western half of the warehouse 
            was used by G T Beard, who provided a storage service for corn merchants, 
            and the eastern half was used by the British Oil and Cake Mill Company 
            and then by Priday Metford & Co, who operated the nearby City 
            Flour Mills. Around 1920, Priday Metford took over the whole building 
            and for the first time made access ways through the partition wall. 
            In the eastern half they established an electric-powered mill for 
            producing stone ground wheat meal flour, and the western half was 
            used for sack cleaning and for storage. Also at this time, two of 
            the original hand operated winches were removed and replaced with 
            electric powered hoists. Each hoist was operated by a rope hanging 
            down outside the building, and these were obviously a temptation 
            to inquisitive passers by. On one occasion, a sack truck was lifted 
            right up to the pulley at the top of the hoist so that its protruding 
            handles displaced some of the tiles in the roof of the gable above.
 New Uses for CellarsThe 
            brick-vaulted cellars of the warehouse had not always been used 
            fully since the early days as they were rather damp and liable to 
            flood occasionally. During the Second World War, they were brought 
            into use again to provide an air raid shelter and a rifle range 
            for the local Home Guard.
 Building Shows its AgePriday 
            Metford & Co continued using the whole building after the war, 
            but one day it was found that one of the roof trusses had rotted 
            right through and was only being supported on the sacks of flour 
            being stored there. Temporary repairs were carried out, but it was 
            clear that other woodwork was also at risk. All the roof trusses 
            and floor beams had been built into the walls, and over the years, 
            dampness had penetrated through the bricks and affected the wood. 
            At this stage, there was a proposal to demolish part of the building 
            in order to make space for constructing a second lock into the River 
            Severn, and because of this, Priday Metford gave up possession in 
            1962. In the event, the second lock did not get built, and the whole 
            warehouse remained standing. The upper floors were not now considered 
            safe, but the ground floor and cellars were used by builders merchants 
            etc until 1975.
 Proposed Demolition Not AllowedBy 
            this time, the building had been listed as being of Special Architectural 
            and Historic Interest, and Gloucester City Council pressed for proper 
            repairs to be carried out. Some temporary repairs were done and 
            shoring was erected to support the front of the building, but in 
            1977 British Waterways applied for listed building consent for demolition. 
            They argued that their responsibility was to run the waterways, 
            not to restore uneconomic buildings, but following a Public Inquiry 
            in 1981, consent for demolition was refused.
  Building Rescued The 
            building remained empty and continued to deteriorate until 1985, 
            when it was bought by Gloucester City Council for conversion into 
            their main offices. The contractors responsible for carrying out 
            the work were Longs of Bath. Most of the roof had to be replaced, 
            but the main timbers were retained wherever possible. Any woodwork 
            that had been affected by rot was cut away and replaced by short 
            metal girders. The former loading doors on each floor were replaced 
            by windows, and the brick vaulting of one of the cellars was destroyed 
            to allow the introduction of a lift shaft and staircase. This work 
            re-exposed the large stone blocks that had been used as foundations 
            and uncovered the original level of the cellar floor before it was 
            raised to reduce flooding. The two surviving hoisting winches were 
            preserved in the roof space.
 A New RoleThe restored 
            building was handed over to Gloucester City Council staff in July 
            1986. To complement the restoration, the Rotary Club of Gloucester 
            and Gloucester Civic Trust replaced the Atlas Bell which used to 
            hang on the corner of the warehouse. Later modifications converted 
            the upper floor of the building into a Civic Suite with Council 
            Chamber and Mayor's Parlour.
 SourcesThis article 
            is mainly based on the minute books of the Canal Company (PRO RAIL 
            829). Other sources include the original plans and contract specification 
            (Glos.RO D2460), memories of an early corn porter (Glos. Extracts 
            Vol.4 p254-263), Poor Rate Books (Glos.RO), BWB evidence at the 
            Public Inquiry, and the memories of Messrs W.Ellis, H.Staite and 
            D.Barnes.
 |